Celeron M 350 vs Xeon X5570
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1792 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.98 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Gainestown (2009−2010) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
| Release date | March 2009 (15 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $49 | no data |
| Current price | $70 (1.4x MSRP) | $221 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 1.3 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 400 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | no data |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 1 MB L2 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 75 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.26V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | PPGA478, H-PBGA479, H-PBGA478, PPGA479 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 21 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | - |
| PAE | 40 Bit | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | - |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 144 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 21 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X5570 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron M 350 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5570 and Celeron M 350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
