Celeron G540T vs Xeon X5570

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5570
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.08
+189%
Celeron G540T
2011
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.72

Xeon X5570 outperforms Celeron G540T by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18832693
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.98no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency2.071.95
Architecture codenameGainestown (2009−2010)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$49no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.93 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus rateno data5 GT/s
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)2 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die size263 mm2131 mm2
Maximum core temperature75 °C65 °C
Number of transistors731 million504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bitno data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size144 GB32 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s17 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T.

PCIe version2.02.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5570 2.08
+189%
Celeron G540T 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5570 3310
+191%
Celeron G540T 1137

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.08 0.72
Recency 30 March 2009 4 September 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon X5570 has a 188.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

Celeron G540T, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G540T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5570 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G540T is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5570 and Celeron G540T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5570
Xeon X5570
Intel Celeron G540T
Celeron G540T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 96 votes

Rate Xeon X5570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Celeron G540T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5570 or Celeron G540T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.