Pentium G630 vs Xeon X5492

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5492
2008
150 Watt
1.88
+119%

Xeon X5492 outperforms Pentium G630 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18962469
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.390.06
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataSandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date1 July 2008 (15 years ago)4 September 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$100
Current price$187 $51 (0.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5492 has 550% better value for money than Pentium G630.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed3.4 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache3 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data131 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °C69 °C
Number of transistorsno data504 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771FCLGA1155
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data+
Demand Based Switching+no data
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+
FSB parity+no data
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT--
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x++
EPT-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory sizeno data32 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for 2nd Generation Intel® Processors
Graphics max frequencyno data1.1 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5492 1.88
+119%
Pentium G630 0.86

Xeon X5492 outperforms Pentium G630 by 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X5492 2912
+119%
Pentium G630 1328

Xeon X5492 outperforms Pentium G630 by 119% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.88 0.86
Recency 1 July 2008 4 September 2011
Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon X5492 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5492 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium G630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5492 and Pentium G630, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5492
Xeon X5492
Intel Pentium G630
Pentium G630

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 50 votes

Rate Xeon X5492 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 334 votes

Rate Pentium G630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5492 or Pentium G630, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.