Pentium 4 HT 3.2E vs Xeon X5460

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2085not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.28no data
Architecture codenameno dataPrescott (2001−2005)
Release date1 October 2007 (17 years ago)February 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data1 (Single-Core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed3.16 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data3.2 GHz
L1 cacheno data16 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data109 mm2
Maximum core temperature63 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data125 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.35Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA771478
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt115 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
FSB parity+no data

Security technologies

Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 115 Watt

Xeon X5460 has a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Pentium 4 HT 3.2E, on the other hand, has 4.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X5460 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium 4 HT 3.2E is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5460 and Pentium 4 HT 3.2E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5460
Xeon X5460
Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.2E
Pentium 4 HT 3.2E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 325 votes

Rate Xeon X5460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 30 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 3.2E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5460 or Pentium 4 HT 3.2E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.