Phenom II X4 945 (95W) vs Xeon X5260
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2618 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 0.92 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Deneb (2009−2011) |
| Release date | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 22 July 2009 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | no data | 258 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 66 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 758 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.35V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA771 | AM3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 95 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W) are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W).
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 October 2007 | 22 July 2009 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 80 Watt | 95 Watt |
Xeon X5260 has 18.8% lower power consumption.
Phenom II X4 945 (95W), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X5260 is a server/workstation processor while Phenom II X4 945 (95W) is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5260 and Phenom II X4 945 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
