Xeon E3120 vs X3460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3460
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.91
+110%

X3460 outperforms E3120 by a whopping 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18832436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.700.06
Market segmentServerServer
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price$67 $160

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X3460 has 1067% better value for money than Xeon E3120.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed2.8 GHz3.16 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHzno data
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3460 1.91
+110%
Xeon E3120 0.91

X3460 outperforms E3120 by 110% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3460 2957
+110%
Xeon E3120 1408

X3460 outperforms E3120 by 110% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.91 0.91
Recency 1 July 2009 1 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon X3460 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3120 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3460 and Xeon E3120, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3460
Xeon X3460
Intel Xeon E3120
Xeon E3120

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 97 votes

Rate Xeon X3460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 10 votes

Rate Xeon E3120 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3460 or Xeon E3120, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.