E-350 vs Xeon X3450

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3450 and E-350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2006not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Power efficiency1.79no data
Architecture codenameno dataZacate (2011−2013)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3450 and E-350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed2.66 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz1.6 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data512K (per core)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm40 nm
Die sizeno data75 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3450 and E-350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FT1
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3450 and E-350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3450 and E-350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3450 and E-350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3450 and E-350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3450 and E-350.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3450 2853
+578%
E-350 421

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3450 431
+310%
E-350 105

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3450 1454
+712%
E-350 179

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2009 4 January 2011
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 18 Watt

Xeon X3450 has 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

E-350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 12.5% more advanced lithography process, and 427.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon X3450 and E-350. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon X3450 is a server/workstation processor while E-350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3450 and E-350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3450
Xeon X3450
AMD E-350
E-350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 299 votes

Rate Xeon X3450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 386 votes

Rate E-350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3450 or E-350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.