Xeon L5420 vs X3430

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon X3430
2009
4 cores / 4 threads
1.48
+7.2%

X3430 outperforms L5420 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking20502113
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.360.27
Market segmentServerServer
Release date1 July 2009 (14 years ago)1 January 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price$51 $84

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X3430 has 33% better value for money than Xeon L5420.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHzno data
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature73 °C57 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt50 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data+
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333no data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanes16no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3430 1.48
+7.2%
Xeon L5420 1.38

X3430 outperforms L5420 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3430 2286
+6.8%
Xeon L5420 2140

X3430 outperforms L5420 by 7% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X3430 377
+13.6%
Xeon L5420 332

X3430 outperforms L5420 by 14% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon X3430 1048
+14.7%
Xeon L5420 914

X3430 outperforms L5420 by 15% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.48 1.38
Recency 1 July 2009 1 January 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 50 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3430 and Xeon L5420, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3430
Xeon X3430
Intel Xeon L5420
Xeon L5420

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 134 votes

Rate Xeon X3430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 141 vote

Rate Xeon L5420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3430 or Xeon L5420, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.