Xeon Silver 4316 vs X3380

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3380
2009
95 Watt
1.66
Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
20.26
+1120%

Silver 4316 outperforms X3380 by a whopping 1120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1984252
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.99
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameno dataIce Lake-SP (2021)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Current priceno data$1075

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data20 (Icosa-Core)
Threadsno data40
Base clock speed3.16 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speedno data3.4 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °C84 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketLGA775FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSXno data+
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2667
Maximum memory sizeno data6 TB
Max memory channelsno data8
ECC memory supportno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data64

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3380 1.66
Xeon Silver 4316 20.26
+1120%

Silver 4316 outperforms X3380 by 1120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3380 2568
Xeon Silver 4316 31341
+1120%

Silver 4316 outperforms X3380 by 1120% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 20.26
Recency 1 January 2009 6 April 2021
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 150 Watt

The Xeon Silver 4316 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3380 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3380 and Xeon Silver 4316, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3380
Xeon X3380
Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3380 or Xeon Silver 4316, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.