Pentium D 965 EE vs Xeon X3380
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2088 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 1.61 | no data |
| Architecture codename | no data | Presler (2005−2007) |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (15 years ago) | March 2006 (18 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.16 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.73 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 28 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 140 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 376 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | LGA775 | 775 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1, DDR2, DDR3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon X3380 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 36.8% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X3380 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium D 965 EE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3380 and Pentium D 965 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
