Core 2 Quad Q9550 vs Xeon X3380

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon X3380
2009
1.65
+10%
Core 2 Quad Q9550
4 cores / 4 threads
1.50

Xeon X3380 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19552021
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for moneyno data2.80
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataCore 2 Quad (Desktop)
Architecture codenameno dataYorkfield (2007−2009)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)no data
Current priceno data$54

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Technical specs

Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data4 (Quad-Core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3.16 GHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2.83 GHz
Bus supportno data1333 MHz
L2 cacheno data12288 KB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cacheno data
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA775LGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1,DDR2,DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3380 1.65
+10%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 1.50

Xeon X3380 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3380 2568
+9.7%
Core 2 Quad Q9550 2340

Xeon X3380 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9550 by 10% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 1.65 1.50

We couldn't decide between Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550. The differences in performance seem too small.

Be aware that Xeon X3380 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9550 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3380 and Core 2 Quad Q9550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3380
Xeon X3380
Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550
Core 2 Quad Q9550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1795 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q9550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3380 or Core 2 Quad Q9550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.