Athlon Gold 3150GE vs Xeon X3370
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2011 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.49 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Dali (2020) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (16 years ago) | 21 July 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Current price | $100 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 96K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 4 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 95 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | - | no data |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2933 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE.
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 21 July 2020 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 35 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X3370 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon Gold 3150GE is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3370 and Athlon Gold 3150GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
