Core 2 Duo E6750 vs Xeon X3330

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3330
2008
95 Watt
1.36
+109%

Xeon X3330 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by a whopping 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking21462649
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.045.17
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameno dataConroe (2006−2007)
Release date1 July 2008 (16 years ago)July 2007 (17 years ago)
Current price$824 $61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Core 2 Duo E6750 has 12825% better value for money than Xeon X3330.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.67 GHz
L1 cacheno data64 KB
L2 cacheno data4 MB
L3 cache6 MB L2 Cache0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperature71 °C72 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-13625V0.85V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketLGA775PLGA775
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NIno data-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Demand Based Switching--
FSB parity--
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750 are enumerated here.

VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3330 1.36
+109%
Core 2 Duo E6750 0.65

Xeon X3330 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by 109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3330 2111
+108%
Core 2 Duo E6750 1013

Xeon X3330 outperforms Core 2 Duo E6750 by 108% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.36 0.65
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon X3330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E6750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3330 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo E6750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3330 and Core 2 Duo E6750, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3330
Xeon X3330
Intel Core 2 Duo E6750
Core 2 Duo E6750

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon X3330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 201 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E6750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3330 or Core 2 Duo E6750, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.