Core i5-10400 vs Xeon X3230
Aggregate performance score
i5-10400 outperforms Xeon X3230 by a whopping 489% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2215 | 920 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 76 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Comet Lake (2020) |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 30 April 2020 (4 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.9 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 4.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 60 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 1200 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-2666 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 41.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.33 | 7.84 |
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 30 April 2020 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 65 Watt |
i5-10400 has a 489.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, and 46.2% lower power consumption.
The Core i5-10400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X3230 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X3230 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-10400 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3230 and Core i5-10400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
