Atom D2700 vs Xeon X3230
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2239 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cedarview (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 1 July 2007 (17 years ago) | 28 December 2011 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $52 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.13 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 8 MB L2 Cache | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 66 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 60 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 176 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCBGA559 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3 |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| AMT | no data | - |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| HD Audio | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | no data |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | - |
| VT-x | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 6.4 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700.
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 4 |
| Total number of SATA ports | no data | 2 |
| Number of USB ports | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 1 July 2007 | 28 December 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 10 Watt |
Atom D2700 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 103.1% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon X3230 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D2700 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3230 and Atom D2700, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
