E-240 vs Xeon W3680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3680 and E-240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1250not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.45no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD E-Series
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Zacate (2011−2013)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)4 January 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350no data
Current price$213 (0.6x MSRP)$118

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3680 and E-240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.33 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm40 nm
Die size239 mm275 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3680 and E-240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and E-240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3680 and E-240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and E-240 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and E-240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6310

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and E-240.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3680 7007
+3493%
E-240 195

Xeon W3680 outperforms E-240 by 3493% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3680 556
+420%
E-240 107

Xeon W3680 outperforms E-240 by 420% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3680 2539
+2187%
E-240 111

Xeon W3680 outperforms E-240 by 2187% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 4 January 2011
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 18 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3680 and E-240. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while E-240 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and E-240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3680
Xeon W3680
AMD E-240
E-240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 137 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 51 vote

Rate E-240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3680 or E-240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.