i5-7640K vs Xeon W3680
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1330 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.18 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 3.21 | no data |
Architecture codename | Gulftown (2010−2011) | Kaby Lake-X (2017) |
Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $350 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 12 | no data |
Base clock speed | 3.33 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.9 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 6144 KB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Die size | 239 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
Number of transistors | 1,170 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1366 | 1151 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 112 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K are enumerated here.
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 6 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 32 nm | 14 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 112 Watt |
Xeon W3680 has 50% more physical cores.
i5-7640K, on the other hand, has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 16.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-7640K is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and Core i5-7640K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.