Atom D2500 vs Xeon W3680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1250not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.45no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Atom
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Cedarview (2011−2012)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 November 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350no data
Current price$213 (0.6x MSRP)$150

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.33 GHz1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.87 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm32 nm
Die size239 mm266 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million176 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FCBGA559
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
AMTno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
HD Audiono data+

Security technologies

Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GB4 GB
Max memory channels31
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/s6.4 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel GMA

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500.

PCIe version2.0no data
PCI Express lanesno data4
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3680 7007
+2748%
Atom D2500 246

Xeon W3680 outperforms Atom D2500 by 2748% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2010 1 November 2011
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 10 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while Atom D2500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3680 and Atom D2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3680
Xeon W3680
Intel Atom D2500
Atom D2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 138 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 36 votes

Rate Atom D2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3680 or Atom D2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.