VIA Nano U2500 vs Xeon W3670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1321not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.75no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataNano
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Isaiah (2009)
Release date29 August 2010 (13 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$295no data
Current price$116 (0.4x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366no data
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt6.8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3670 6435
+3134%
VIA Nano U2500 199

Xeon W3670 outperforms VIA Nano U2500 by 3134% in Passmark.

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 6 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3670 is a server/workstation processor while VIA Nano U2500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3670 and VIA Nano U2500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3670
Xeon W3670
VIA Nano U2500
Nano U2500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 43 votes

Rate Xeon W3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 224 votes

Rate VIA Nano U2500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3670 or VIA Nano U2500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.