Core i7-940XM vs Xeon W3670

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3670
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.16
+195%

Xeon W3670 outperforms i7-940XM by a whopping 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking13222120
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.74no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core i7
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Clarksfield (2009−2010)
Release date29 August 2010 (13 years ago)20 June 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$295$1,096
Current price$116 (0.4x MSRP)$200 (0.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.13 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz3.33 GHz
Bus supportno data2500 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2296 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million774 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FCPGA988,PGA988
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0+
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE36 Bit36 Bit
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333
Maximum memory size24 GB8 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s21 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataNone

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM.

PCIe version2.02
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3670 4.16
+195%
i7-940XM 1.41

Xeon W3670 outperforms Core i7-940XM by 195% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3670 6435
+194%
i7-940XM 2187

Xeon W3670 outperforms Core i7-940XM by 194% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3670 518
+33.2%
i7-940XM 389

Xeon W3670 outperforms Core i7-940XM by 33% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3670 2321
+116%
i7-940XM 1073

Xeon W3670 outperforms Core i7-940XM by 116% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.16 1.41
Recency 29 August 2010 20 June 2010
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Cost $295 $1096
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 55 Watt

The Xeon W3670 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-940XM in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3670 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-940XM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3670 and Core i7-940XM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3670
Xeon W3670
Intel Core i7-940XM
Core i7-940XM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 43 votes

Rate Xeon W3670 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 58 votes

Rate Core i7-940XM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3670 or Core i7-940XM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.