Xeon X5270 vs W3550

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3550
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
2.11
+111%

Xeon W3550 outperforms Xeon X5270 by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18812464
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.59no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency1.481.14
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)no data
Release date9 August 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$235no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)no data
Threads8no data
Base clock speed3.06 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.33 GHzno data
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)no data
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C61 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270 are enumerated here.

VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3550 2.11
+111%
Xeon X5270 1.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3550 3223
+111%
Xeon X5270 1524

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.11 1.00
Recency 9 August 2009 1 July 2008
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon W3550 has a 111% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.

Xeon X5270, on the other hand, has 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W3550 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5270 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3550 and Xeon X5270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3550
Xeon W3550
Intel Xeon X5270
Xeon X5270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 81 vote

Rate Xeon W3550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon X5270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3550 or Xeon X5270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.