Atom Z612 vs Xeon W3550
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1811 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 21.10 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Atom |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Lincroft (2010−2011) |
| Release date | August 2009 (14 years ago) | 4 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $235 | no data |
| Current price | $100 (0.4x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.06 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 400 MT/s |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 65.2526 mm28.89 mm × 7.34 mm |
| Maximum core temperature | 68 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 140 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA1366 | Intel BGA 518 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 1.3 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | - | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | 2 GB |
| Max memory channels | 3 | 1 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 3.2 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | PowerVR SGX535 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 1 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon W3550 is a server/workstation processor while Atom Z612 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3550 and Atom Z612, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
