Opteron 252 vs Xeon W3503

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3503
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.70
+45.8%
Opteron 252
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 92 Watt
0.48

Xeon W3503 outperforms Opteron 252 by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27172918
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.15no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency0.510.49
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Troy (2005)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)February 2005 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$63

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Base clock speed2.4 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz2.6 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Number of transistors731 million106 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.8V-1.225Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
Socket1366940
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt92 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252 are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3503 0.70
+45.8%
Opteron 252 0.48

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3503 1118
+47.1%
Opteron 252 760

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.70 0.48
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 92 Watt

Xeon W3503 has a 45.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Opteron 252, on the other hand, has 41.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W3503 is our recommended choice as it beats the Opteron 252 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3503 and Opteron 252, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3503
Xeon W3503
AMD Opteron 252
Opteron 252

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon W3503 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Opteron 252 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3503 or Opteron 252, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.