Xeon E-2488 vs W-3375

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
38.68
+99.6%

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Xeon E-2488 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking83306
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data76.52
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores388 (Octa-Core)
Threads7616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s16 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size4 TB128 GB
Max memory channels82
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version45
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3375 38.68
+99.6%
Xeon E-2488 19.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3375 59069
+99.6%
Xeon E-2488 29590

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.68 19.38
Recency 29 July 2021 14 December 2023
Physical cores 38 8
Threads 76 16
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon W-3375 has a 99.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 375% more physical cores and 375% more threads.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and 184.2% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E-2488 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3375 or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.