Ryzen 7 7800X vs Xeon W-3375
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 76 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 7 |
Architecture codename | Ice Lake-W (2021) | Zen 4 |
Release date | 29 July 2021 (3 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 38 | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 76 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 5 GHz |
L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 512 KB |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB |
L3 cache | 57 MB (shared) | 96 MB |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm, 6 nm |
Die size | no data | 71+122 mm |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 83 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA4189 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 120 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Speed Shift | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
TSX | + | - |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Status | Launched | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
SGX | - | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | no data |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
Maximum memory size | 4 TB | 128 GB |
Max memory channels | 8 | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X.
PCIe version | 4 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 64 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 38 | 8 |
Threads | 76 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 10 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 270 Watt | 120 Watt |
Xeon W-3375 has 375% more physical cores and 375% more threads.
Ryzen 7 7800X, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7800X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Ryzen 7 7800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.