Ultra 9 288V vs Xeon W-3375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
37.20
+197%
Core Ultra 9 288V
2024
8 cores / 8 threads, 30 Watt
12.52

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Core Ultra 9 288V by a whopping 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking85621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Power efficiency13.0539.52
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores388 (Octa-Core)
Threads768
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/s37 MHz
L1 cache64K (per core)192 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4189Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe version45.0
PCI Express lanes644

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3375 37.20
+197%
Ultra 9 288V 12.52

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3375 59091
+197%
Ultra 9 288V 19895

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.20 12.52
Recency 29 July 2021 24 September 2024
Physical cores 38 8
Threads 76 8
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 30 Watt

Xeon W-3375 has a 197.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 375% more physical cores and 850% more threads.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 800% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 9 288V in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 9 288V is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 35 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3375 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.