EPYC 7573X vs Xeon W-3365

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	74	38
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	6.44
Market segment	Server	Server
Architecture codename	Ice Lake-W (2021)	Milan-X (2022)
Release date	29 July 2021 (2 years ago)	22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	no data	$5250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)	32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads	64	64
Base clock speed	2.7 GHz	2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	3.6 GHz
L1 cache	64K (per core)	64K (per core)
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)
L3 cache	48 MB (shared)	768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	10 nm	7 nm
Die size	no data	8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature	77 °C	no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)	81 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	33,200 million
64 bit support	+	-
Windows 11 compatibility	+	no data
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	1
Socket	FCLGA4189	SP3
Power consumption (TDP)	270 Watt	280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
Status	Launched	no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data
SGX	-	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-3200	DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size	4 TB	no data
Max memory channels	8	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version	4	4.0
PCI Express lanes	64	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon W-3365 by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	38.17	44.89
Recency	29 July 2021	22 March 2022
Chip lithography	10 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	270 Watt	280 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3365 and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---