Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS vs Xeon W-3323

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3323
2021
12 cores / 24 threads, 220 Watt
16.73
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
17.12
+2.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Xeon W-3323 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking356343
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4)
Release date29 July 2021 (2 years ago)13 June 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache18 MB (shared)16 MB
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA4189FP7/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)220 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

PCIe version4no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3323 16.73
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 17.12
+2.3%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Xeon W-3323 by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3323 25875
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS 26486
+2.4%

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS outperforms Xeon W-3323 by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.73 17.12
Recency 29 July 2021 13 June 2023
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 220 Watt 35 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS.

Be aware that Xeon W-3323 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3323 and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3323
Xeon W-3323
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3323 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3323 or Ryzen 7 PRO 7840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.