Xeon Silver 4510 vs W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.08
+16.5%
Xeon Silver 4510
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 150 Watt
22.38

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Xeon Silver 4510 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking191241
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.95100.00
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.5813.58
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$563

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4510 has 1920% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads5624
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data84 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)
Maximum memory size2 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 26.08
+16.5%
Xeon Silver 4510 22.38

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39834
+16.6%
Xeon Silver 4510 34170

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.08 22.38
Recency 3 June 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 28 12
Threads 56 24
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 16.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.

Xeon Silver 4510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and 36.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4510 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Silver 4510, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Silver 4510
Xeon Silver 4510

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4510 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Xeon Silver 4510, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.