Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Xeon W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.03
+146%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.56

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G by a whopping 146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195757
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.96no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency11.5814.81
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads5612
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2537
L1 cache1.75 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistorsno data9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size2 TB128 GB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 26.03
+146%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 10.56

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39834
+146%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16161

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3275M 1219
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 1565
+28.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3275M 12239
+100%
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 6110

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.03 10.56
Recency 3 June 2019 21 July 2020
Physical cores 28 6
Threads 56 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 146.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 366.7% more physical cores and 366.7% more threads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 215.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1593 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.