Ryzen 3 3250U vs Xeon W-3275M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
22.91
+981%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by a whopping 981% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2611995
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.77no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency4.745.99
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataGlobalFoundries
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads564
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier2526
L1 cache1.75 MB96 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data148 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C95 °C
Number of transistorsno data3,500 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size2 TB32 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6412

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3275M 22.91
+981%
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.12

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 40419
+978%
Ryzen 3 3250U 3748

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3275M 1184
+57.9%
Ryzen 3 3250U 750

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3275M 12077
+729%
Ryzen 3 3250U 1457

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.91 2.12
Recency 3 June 2019 6 January 2020
Physical cores 28 2
Threads 56 4
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 980.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 1266.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2283 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3275M and Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.