Ryzen AI Max+ 388 vs Xeon W-3275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019, $4,449
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
22.38
+24.5%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Ryzen AI Max+ 388 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking296394
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.66no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.70no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Strix Halo (2025)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MBno data
L2 cache28 MBno data
L3 cache38.5 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt8 MB + 32 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3275 22.38
+24.5%
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 17.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3275 39449
+24.4%
Samples: 10
Ryzen AI Max+ 388 31702
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.38 17.98
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 8 Watt

Xeon W-3275 has a 24.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388, on the other hand, has 2462.5% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Ryzen AI Max+ 388

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 388 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen AI Max+ 388, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.