Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD EPYC 7702P
Comparing Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Information on Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P are enumerated here.
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P.
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Let's see how good Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P are for gaming compared with game system requirements. Remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately. Also, your gaming PC must have a decent enough GPU to perform well.
Both CPUs satisfy the 100% minimum and 100% recommended requirements of all games known to us.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3275M
TXT (Trusted Execution Technology - protects the system against viruses and rootkits residing in BIOS or in a boot sector)
vPro (a marketing umbrella term for several Intel technologies: AMT, TXT, EDB, VT, Anti-Theft and some others)
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7702P
40.4% better performance in benchmarks
Somewhat newer (7 August 2019 vs 3 June 2019)
Cheaper ($4220 vs $8977)
Higher boost clock speed (3350 vs 2500 MHz)
Finer manufacturing process technology (7 vs 14 nm)
Lower power consumption (200W vs 205W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.
Virtualization (Hardware acceleration of virtual machines)
So, which one is the better CPU?
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends AMD EPYC 7702P.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and EPYC 7702P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.