i9-13900H vs Xeon W-3275M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.35
+40.8%
Core i9-13900H
2023
14 cores / 20 threads, 45 Watt
18.00

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Core i9-13900H by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking200342
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.07no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Raptor Lake-H
Power efficiency11.7037.85
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$617

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)14 (Tetradeca-Core)
Performance-coresno data6
Efficient-coresno data8
Threads5620
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1744
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TB96 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® Iris® Xe Graphics eligible
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.5 GHz
Execution Unitsno data96

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.1
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes648

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 25.35
+40.8%
i9-13900H 18.00

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 40261
+40.8%
i9-13900H 28593

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 25.35 18.00
Recency 3 June 2019 4 January 2023
Physical cores 28 14
Threads 56 20
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 40.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 180% more threads.

i9-13900H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 355.6% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-13900H in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900H is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Core i9-13900H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Core i9-13900H
Core i9-13900H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 557 votes

Rate Core i9-13900H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Core i9-13900H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.