Xeon Gold 6248 vs Ryzen AI Max+ 388

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen AI Max+ 388
8 cores / 16 threads, 55 Watt
17.97
+7.1%
Xeon Gold 6248
2019, $3,072
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
16.78

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 outperforms Xeon Gold 6248 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking393445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.27
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency13.884.75
DesignerAMDIntel
Architecture codenameStrix Halo (2025)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release dateno data2 April 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,072

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)20 (Icosa-Core)
Threads1640
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data25
L1 cacheno data1.25 MB
L2 cacheno data20 MB
L3 cacheno data27.5 MB
Chip lithographyno data14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data86 °C
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data4 (Multiprocessor)
Socketno dataFCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4-2933
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 17.97
+7.1%
Xeon Gold 6248 16.78

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 31702
+7.1%
Samples: 1
Xeon Gold 6248 29598
Samples: 20

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.97 16.78
Physical cores 8 20
Threads 16 40
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 150 Watt

Ryzen AI Max+ 388 has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 172.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6248, on the other hand, has 150% more physical cores and 150% more threads.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Intel Xeon Gold 6248.

Be aware that Ryzen AI Max+ 388 is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6248 is a server/workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Ryzen AI Max+ 388
Intel Xeon Gold 6248
Xeon Gold 6248

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen AI Max 388 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 12 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6248 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen AI Max+ 388 and Xeon Gold 6248, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.