Ryzen 5 6600U vs Xeon W-3275

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.87
+147%

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Ryzen 5 6600U by a whopping 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking161669
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.06no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Rembrandt-U (Zen 3+)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,449no data
Current price$5391 (1.2x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads5612
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FP7
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 660M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275 26.87
+147%
Ryzen 5 6600U 10.86

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Ryzen 5 6600U by 147% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3275 41554
+147%
Ryzen 5 6600U 16792

Xeon W-3275 outperforms Ryzen 5 6600U by 147% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.87 10.86
Physical cores 28 6
Threads 56 12
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 15 Watt

The Xeon W-3275 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 6600U in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3275 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 5 6600U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275 and Ryzen 5 6600U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275
Xeon W-3275
AMD Ryzen 5 6600U
Ryzen 5 6600U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 93 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 6600U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275 or Ryzen 5 6600U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.