EPYC 9474F vs Xeon W-3245M

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	340	9
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	9.91	9.56
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon W	AMD EPYC
Architecture codename	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)	Genoa
Release date	3 June 2019 (5 years ago)	10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$5,002	$6,780
Current price	$2000 (0.4x MSRP)	$3950 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3245M has 4% better value for money than EPYC 9474F.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	16 (Hexadeca-Core)	48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads	32	96
Base clock speed	3.2 GHz	3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed	4.6 GHz	4.1 GHz
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	1 MB	64K (per core)
L2 cache	16 MB	1 MB (per core)
L3 cache	22 MB	256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm, 6 nm
Die size	no data	8x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature	77 °C	no data
Number of transistors	no data	52,560 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	no data
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	2
Socket	FCLGA3647	SP5
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	+
AVX	+	+
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	no data
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	no data
TSX	+	no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	+	no data
Status	Launched	no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F are enumerated here.

AMD-V	no data	+
VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	no data
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2933	DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size	2 TB	6 TiB
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	140.8 GB/s	460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F.

PCIe version	3.0	5.0
PCI Express lanes	64	128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

EPYC 9474F outperforms Xeon W-3245M by 292% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	17.34	67.89
Recency	3 June 2019	10 November 2022
Physical cores	16	48
Threads	32	96
Cost	$5002	$6780
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	205 Watt	360 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3245M and EPYC 9474F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---