Core i5 vs Xeon W-3245M
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-3245M outperforms Core i5 by a whopping 699% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-3245M and Core i5 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 340 | 1773 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 9.91 | 6.71 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | no data |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | no data |
| Release date | 3 June 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $5,002 | no data |
| Current price | $2000 (0.4x MSRP) | $191 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-3245M has 48% better value for money than Core i5.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-3245M and Core i5 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 16 (Hexadeca-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 32 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | no data |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 1 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 22 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 77 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-3245M and Core i5 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core i5. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Status | Launched | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W-3245M and Core i5 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core i5 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core i5. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 2 TB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245M and Core i5.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon W-3245M outperforms Core i5 by 699% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon W-3245M outperforms Core i5 by 932% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.34 | 2.17 |
| Recency | 3 June 2019 | 1 October 2023 |
The Xeon W-3245M is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i5 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-3245M is a server/workstation processor while Core i5 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3245M and Core i5, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
