Xeon Gold 6262 vs W-3235

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.71
+17.2%

Xeon W-3235 outperforms Xeon Gold 6262 by a moderate 17% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking412534
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.90no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency8.479.63
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)1 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3.3 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache12 MBno data
L3 cache19.25 MB33 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature72 °C91 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt135 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3235 16.71
+17.2%
Xeon Gold 6262 14.26

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3235 25578
+17.2%
Xeon Gold 6262 21823

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.71 14.26
Recency 3 June 2019 1 April 2019
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 135 Watt

Xeon W-3235 has a 17.2% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

Xeon Gold 6262, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3235 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 6262 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6262, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
Intel Xeon Gold 6262
Xeon Gold 6262

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3235 or Xeon Gold 6262, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.