Xeon Gold 5416S vs W-3235

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.50
Xeon Gold 5416S
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 150 Watt
23.53
+42.6%

Gold 5416S outperforms W-3235 by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking365195
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.1534.03
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Sapphire Rapids
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398no data
Current price$1077 (0.8x MSRP)$1244

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 5416S has 98% better value for money than Xeon W-3235.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads2432
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache768 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache12 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB30 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Maximum core temperature72 °C79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-4400
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3235 16.50
Xeon Gold 5416S 23.53
+42.6%

Gold 5416S outperforms W-3235 by 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3235 25520
Xeon Gold 5416S 36400
+42.6%

Gold 5416S outperforms W-3235 by 43% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.50 23.53
Recency 3 June 2019 10 January 2023
Physical cores 12 16
Threads 24 32
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 150 Watt

The Xeon Gold 5416S is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3235 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 5416S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
Intel Xeon Gold 5416S
Xeon Gold 5416S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 21 vote

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 5416S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3235 or Xeon Gold 5416S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.