Xeon E-2488 vs W-3225

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3225
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
11.68
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.99
+62.6%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Xeon W-3225 by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking685322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.5974.70
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency6.6618.23
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E-2488 has 493% better value for money than Xeon W-3225.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz5.6 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s16 GT/s
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache16.5 MB24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size1 TB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe version3.05
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3225 11.68
Xeon E-2488 18.99
+62.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3225 17874
Xeon E-2488 29060
+62.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.68 18.99
Recency 3 June 2019 14 December 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon E-2488 has a 62.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 68.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3225 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3225 and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3225 or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.