Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE vs Xeon W-3225

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3225
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
11.68
+63.4%

Xeon W-3225 outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6851007
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.58no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.6618.63
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads168
Base clock speed3.7 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3735
L1 cache512 KB256 KB
L2 cache8 MB2 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data156 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data9800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647AM4
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1 TB128 GB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s51.196 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3225 11.68
+63.4%
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 7.15

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3225 17874
+63.3%
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE 10943

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.68 7.15
Recency 3 June 2019 21 July 2020
Physical cores 8 4
Threads 16 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon W-3225 has a 63.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 357.1% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3225 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3225 and Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3225
Xeon W-3225
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 57 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3225 or Ryzen 3 PRO 4350GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.