Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 vs Xeon W-3175X
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-3175X outperforms Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 212 | 232 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 13.08 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | AMD Strix Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 3/5/7/9) |
| Power efficiency | 8.69 | 38.26 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Strix Point-HX (Zen 5) (2024) |
| Release date | 8 October 2018 (6 years ago) | 25 July 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 28 (Octacosa-Core) | 12 (Dodeca-Core) |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 5.1 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 31 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.75 MB | no data |
| L2 cache | 28 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 cache | 38.5 MB (shared) | 24 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 85 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,000 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | FP8 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 255 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (55 TOPS), SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR5 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 6 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 128.001 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon 890M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 24.29 | 22.66 |
| Recency | 8 October 2018 | 25 July 2024 |
| Physical cores | 28 | 12 |
| Threads | 56 | 24 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 255 Watt | 54 Watt |
Xeon W-3175X has a 7.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 133.3% more physical cores and 133.3% more threads.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 372.2% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375.
Be aware that Xeon W-3175X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and Ryzen AI 9 HX 375, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
