EPYC 72F3 vs Xeon W-3175X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads
24.04
+36.4%
EPYC 72F3
2021
8 cores / 16 threads
17.62

Xeon W-3175X outperforms EPYC 72F3 by 36% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking183316
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money16.903.03
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Milan (2021)
Release date19 December 2018 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999$2,468
Current price$1749 (0.6x MSRP)$4952 (2x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3175X has 458% better value for money than EPYC 72F3.

Technical specs

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 24.04
+36.4%
EPYC 72F3 17.62

Xeon W-3175X outperforms EPYC 72F3 by 36% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3175X 37167
+36.4%
EPYC 72F3 27252

Xeon W-3175X outperforms EPYC 72F3 by 36% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 24.04 17.62
Recency 19 December 2018 15 March 2021
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Cost $2999 $2468
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 180 Watt

The Xeon W-3175X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 72F3 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 72F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
AMD EPYC 72F3
EPYC 72F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 117 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 6 votes

Rate EPYC 72F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or EPYC 72F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.