Xeon Platinum 8352M vs W-3175X

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 255 Watt
26.67
Xeon Platinum 8352M
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 185 Watt
27.96
+4.8%

Xeon Platinum 8352M outperforms Xeon W-3175X by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking184168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.15no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency9.8514.23
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date19 December 2018 (5 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads5664
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GB6 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 26.67
Xeon Platinum 8352M 27.96
+4.8%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3175X 42357
Xeon Platinum 8352M 44406
+4.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.67 27.96
Recency 19 December 2018 6 April 2021
Physical cores 28 32
Threads 56 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon Platinum 8352M has a 4.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 14.3% more physical cores and 14.3% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 37.8% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and Xeon Platinum 8352M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
Intel Xeon Platinum 8352M
Xeon Platinum 8352M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 119 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or Xeon Platinum 8352M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.