i7-9700F vs Xeon W-3175X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 255 Watt
24.29
+180%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i7-9700F by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking215898
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.989.18
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Core i7
Power efficiency8.6912.15
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999$323

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3175X has 41% better value for money than i7-9700F.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads568
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3130
L1 cache1.75 MB512 KB
L2 cache28 MB2 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size512 GB128 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 24.29
+180%
i7-9700F 8.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3175X 37167
+181%
i7-9700F 13247

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3175X 1466
i7-9700F 1576
+7.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3175X 14191
+125%
i7-9700F 6303

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.29 8.66
Recency 8 October 2018 23 April 2019
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 8
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-3175X has a 180.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 600% more threads.

i7-9700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 months, and 292.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3175X is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9700F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3175X is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-9700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and Core i7-9700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
Intel Core i7-9700F
Core i7-9700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 666 votes

Rate Core i7-9700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or Core i7-9700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.