Xeon Platinum 8274 vs W-2225
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1030 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 5.97 | no data |
Release date | 1 October 2019 (5 years ago) | 1 April 2019 (5 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 48 |
Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 4 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
L3 cache | 8.25 MB | 35.75 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | 65 °C |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA2066 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 240 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | + | + |
vPro | no data | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | + | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
TSX | + | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | no data |
MPX | + | - |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274 are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 1 TB |
Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.85 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274.
PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 October 2019 | 1 April 2019 |
Physical cores | 4 | 24 |
Threads | 8 | 48 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 240 Watt |
Xeon W-2225 has an age advantage of 6 months, and 128.6% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8274, on the other hand, has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Platinum 8274, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.