Atom N270 vs Xeon W-2195

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking342not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.58no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Atom
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)DiamondVille (2008−2009)
Release date29 September 2017 (6 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,553$44

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads362
Base clock speed2.3 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0FSB
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier2312
L1 cache64K (per core)56 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data25.9638 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C90 °C
Number of transistorsno data47 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketSocket R4PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt2.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE, Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle States+-
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x+-
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size512 GB8 GB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2195 27978
+20472%
Atom N270 136

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 September 2017 2 April 2008
Physical cores 18 1
Threads 36 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon W-2195 has an age advantage of 9 years, 1700% more physical cores and 1700% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom N270, on the other hand, has 6900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-2195 is a server/workstation processor while Atom N270 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2195 and Atom N270, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195
Intel Atom N270
Atom N270

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2195 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 222 votes

Rate Atom N270 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2195 or Atom N270, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.