EPYC 7573X vs Xeon W-2175

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2175
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 140 Watt
15.09
EPYC 7573X
2022
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.89
+197%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon W-2175 by a whopping 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking43338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.776.44
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Milan-X (2022)
Release date15 October 2017 (6 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,947no data
Current price$337 (0.2x MSRP)$5250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2175 has 393% better value for money than EPYC 7573X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2864
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512K (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die size484 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066SP3
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.3 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2175 15.09
EPYC 7573X 44.89
+197%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon W-2175 by 197% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-2175 23345
EPYC 7573X 69432
+197%

EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon W-2175 by 197% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.09 44.89
Recency 15 October 2017 22 March 2022
Physical cores 14 32
Threads 28 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2175 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2175 and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2175
Xeon W-2175
AMD EPYC 7573X
EPYC 7573X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 10 votes

Rate Xeon W-2175 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 7573X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2175 or EPYC 7573X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.