C-70 vs Xeon W-2175

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2175 and C-70 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking480not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.63no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD C-Series
Power efficiency9.92no data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ontario (2011−2012)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)1 September 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,947no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2175 and C-70 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads282
Base clock speed2.5 GHz1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz1.33 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache896 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache14 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm40 nm
Die size484 mm275 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2175 and C-70 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA2066FT1 BGA 413-Ball
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2175 and C-70. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A), AMD-V, Radeon HD 6290 (276-400 MHz)
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2175 and C-70 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2175 and C-70 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2175 and C-70. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR3 Single-channel
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon HD 6290

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2175 and C-70.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2175 23316
+7302%
C-70 315

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-2175 1208
+1120%
C-70 99

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-2175 8256
+4728%
C-70 171

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 August 2017 1 September 2012
Physical cores 14 2
Threads 28 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 9 Watt

Xeon W-2175 has an age advantage of 4 years, 600% more physical cores and 1300% more threads, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

C-70, on the other hand, has 1455.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-2175 and C-70. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-2175 is a server/workstation processor while C-70 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2175 and C-70, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2175
Xeon W-2175
AMD C-70
C-70

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-2175 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 94 votes

Rate C-70 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2175 or C-70, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.